Hailuo vs Kling: Which AI Video Generator Should You Use in 2026?
By the Maybe Labs teamHailuo (MiniMax) and Kling (Kuaishou) are the two most cost-efficient AI video generators heading into the back half of 2026 — both far cheaper per clip than the U.S. labs, both improving fast. They're not the same tool, though: Kling has pulled ahead on fidelity, length, and native audio; Hailuo still wins on raw cost and stylized output. Here's how they actually compare.
The short answer
- Kling 3.0 generates longer clips (up to ~15 seconds native, ~60 seconds via multi-shot chaining) with native audio and lip-sync built in.
- Hailuo 2.3 is cheaper per clip and faster in its "Fast" variant, with a genuine edge in stylized output like anime and illustration.
- Neither generates a branded, structured marketing video — both output raw footage you'd still need to edit, caption, and brand.
- For a launch or product video specifically, Maybe Labs skips that assembly step entirely.
Hailuo vs Kling at a glance
| Hailuo 2.3 (MiniMax) | Kling 3.0 (Kuaishou) | |
|---|---|---|
| Max clip length | ~10 seconds | ~15 seconds native, ~60s via multi-shot |
| Resolution | Up to 1080p | Up to native 4K |
| Native audio & lip-sync | No | Yes, generated in the same pass |
| Stylized output (anime, CG) | Strong | Improving, less specialized |
| Free tier | Daily credits, watermarked, 768p | Daily credits, watermarked |
| Starting paid tier | ~$9.99/mo | ~$6/mo |
| Best for | Cheap, stylized clips at volume | Longer, higher-fidelity clips with audio |
Figures are as of mid-2026 and change frequently on both platforms — verify current pricing and specs before budgeting a production around either.
Where Kling pulls ahead
Kling's biggest advantage is native audio: dialogue, lip-sync, and ambient sound generated in the same pass as the video, so you're not layering audio in post. It also generates longer continuous narrative through multi-shot chaining and renders at native 4K rather than an upscale — visible detail if you're delivering to a large screen.
Where Hailuo pulls ahead
Hailuo is meaningfully cheaper per clip and its Fast variant generates in under a minute, which matters if you're iterating on many variations — product listings, A/B creative tests, batch social content. Its stylized modes (anime, ink-wash, game CG) also hold up better than Kling's more general-purpose look.
What neither one does
Both are generative-footage tools: you get a clip, not a marketing video. Neither writes your story, applies your brand colors and type, or adds a CTA — that's a separate editing pass either way. If the video is actually about your product — a launch, an update, an explainer — that gap is the whole job. See AI video editor vs AI video generator.
Hailuo vs Kling FAQ
Which is cheaper, Hailuo or Kling?
Hailuo is generally cheaper per clip, especially with its Fast variant. Kling's entry paid tier is also low-cost, but higher resolution and multi-shot generation consume credits faster.
Which generates longer videos?
Kling — a single generation reaches roughly 15 seconds natively, and chained multi-shot sequences can run close to a minute, versus Hailuo's ~10-second clips.
Does either generate audio?
Kling's latest models generate native synced audio and lip-sync in the same pass. Hailuo does not generate native dialogue or sound in most tiers.
What should I use instead for a marketing video?
For a designed, on-brand launch or product video, Maybe Labs — it outputs an editable video with your brand and a CTA rather than raw footage you'd still have to assemble.
Hailuo for cheap volume, Kling for length and audio. For an on-brand video that converts, describe yours to Maybe Labs instead.
Make your next launch in motion
Maybe Labs turns prompts into product launch and update videos: story, assets, and final cut, start to end.
Get early access →